From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3258fa06e2efdf3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-01 09:30:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.97.175.23!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Tasks unleashed Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 18:30:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.97.175.23 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1051806609 13855428 212.97.175.23 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36815 Date: 2003-05-01T18:30:27+02:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff dice... > Nonetheless, I would consider it a bug to fail to free a task that is > both terminated and U_D'ed. What happens if you put a "delay" in the > loop? Increasingly consumed memory. I have put a 0.1 delay. > > What things could arise from that? > > Bad things. ;-) I'm doomed... XD -- ------------------------- Jano 402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es -------------------------