From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e53617e6821a1c7e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-01 05:33:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!news.tiscali.fr!deine.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.97.175.23!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Suspicious reentrant semaphore Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:33:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20030430140753.72a0dcc9.spam@broster.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.97.175.23 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1051792422 13495403 212.97.175.23 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36802 Date: 2003-05-01T14:33:59+02:00 List-Id: Ian Broster dice... > > it. I know that Current_Task shouldn't be called inside entries > > (in fact Gnat doesn't allow it, I tried :-P) but doesn't > > Last time I (accidentally!) checked, GNAT `allowed' you to use > it in a PO, but gave a different result to what you might > be expecting. My test was with 3.15p NT, not a warning but a error. -- ------------------------- Jano 402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es -------------------------