From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e429176c9adb07b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-17 12:45:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!news0.de.colt.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!71102-cm.able.ES!not-for-mail From: Jano <402450@cepsz.unizar.es> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Best way to isolate a GUI? Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71102-cm.able.es (212.97.171.102) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1045514734 49784150 212.97.171.102 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34178 Date: 2003-02-17T21:52:23+01:00 List-Id: En el mensaje , porton@ex-code.com dice... > In article , > Jano <402450@cepsz.unizar.es> writes: > > as for my (lately) frequent questions, you may be aware I'm starting a > > new project in Ada. Well, the matter is that I want the core > > functionality to be isolated from the GUI. And that's the question: > > how's the best mean to do that. > > > > I've thought the following: > > > > 2) Use sockets to communicate the two processes. > > 2.a) Use regular Ada streams to pass data types. > > 2.b) Use some other protocol, for example [compressed] XML. > > Ada has partitions for this! (See RM.) I thought of this after posting, but I'm really ignorant about the distributed annex. Shall check, of course. -- ------------------------- Jano 402450[at]cepsz.unizar.es -------------------------