From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-05 09:53:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) Date: 5 Jun 2003 11:53:34 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1054822431.105080@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1054830968.330764@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054831951 17150 192.135.80.34 (5 Jun 2003 16:52:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38698 Date: 2003-06-05T11:53:34-05:00 List-Id: In article <1054830968.330764@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>, Hyman Rosen writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> In the same way that case sensitivity was forced on the C* users >> as a prejudice of the language designers. > > Sure. Anyway, I finally remembered that Pascal is case-insensitive, > so it makes sense that Ada is as well, just for that. >From my perspective, the command language for my operating system is case-blind, so it makes sense. Obviously Unix fans would feel differently.