From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,daf1e35a4e978e9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 05:10:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "SteveD" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net> Subject: Re: have to use unrestricted access but just what about access X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.225.227.101 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net 1024575020 12.225.227.101 (Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:10:20 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:10:20 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:10:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26471 Date: 2002-06-20T12:10:20+00:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" wrote in message news:0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net... > Hi, > > How can the unrestricted_access attribute be replaced by just access in the > following code? > You didn't provide enough code in your example to answer the question. Namely where your structure is defined. If it is defined inside a procedure you'll need Unchecked_Access (although Unrestricted_Access will work). SteveD