From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d2df3e9ad18fa63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-21 20:45:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ISO/IEC 14519 - Ada POSIX binding Date: 21 Jun 2003 22:45:48 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3EF2F6B8.3030706@noplace.com> <3EF44B79.2000407@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1056253440 6637 192.135.80.34 (22 Jun 2003 03:44:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 03:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39552 Date: 2003-06-21T22:45:48-05:00 List-Id: In article , Ludovic Brenta writes: > As noted elsewhere in this thread, POSIX.5 uses an exception > (Posix.Posix_Error) to report that an error occurred, and an > "errno"-like variable to specify what kind of error occurred. Thanks > to the exception, a lot of the ugliness goes away, and thanks to the > variable, it is easier to add new error codes to POSIX.5 without > breaking existing apps. Is that variable specific to a single task ? How does one accomplish that without declaring it within the task ? If it is not specific to a single task, how does one avoid conflict between tasks on simultaneous errors ?