From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbd35bb508093bd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-10 06:49:16 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!HSNX.atgi.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!151.164.30.35!cyclone.swbell.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT Hatred (was Re: New Ada compiler for .NET)
References: <mailman.1039145222.21352.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <asrfl0$12df$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3df17093_1@news.tm.net.my>
 <asth1t$2udb$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <65wI9.42818$vM1.3404322@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <3df41e46_2@news.tm.net.my> <1039456034.146728@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <uP4J9.385$hw3.99@sccrnsc04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <M9nJ9.2219$c6.2501@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:48:21 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.133.155
X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com
X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1039531756 151.168.133.155 (Tue,
 10 Dec 2002 09:49:16 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:49:16 EST
Organization: Raytheon Company
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31639
Date: 2002-12-10T09:48:21-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Why is it even theoretically inappropriate to fight in order to ensure the
> continued delivery of a substance so essential to our survival and
> independence? ....

I agree with much of Medved comments,
including that it's NOT only "about oil"

Still, the above question is disturbing,
because the answers are: (1) Oil is NOT
essential to our survival or independence.
(2) There may be valid reasons for war, but
our comfort and convenience is NOT one of them!

He goes a little too far on some of
his other points as well.