From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,77f1de37204ed8a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-04 08:52:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <87hexx34kt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Subject: Re: Operator visibility question Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 11:52:12 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:52:12 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8070 Date: 2001-06-04T15:52:12+00:00 List-Id: In article <87hexx34kt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says... > >If one argument of a comparison operator is a universal integer, >a universal real, a string, or an aggregate, then the visibility >check is not performed. I guess the bug is in somehwere in Hmmm. That makes me wonder exactly which "<" the compiler is using when it generates the code? --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com