From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5072448cfe6241eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-14 18:16:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!demon!peernews!peer.cwci.net!newspeer1-gui.server.ntli.net!ntli.net!newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "martin.m.dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <_DcY8.524447$cQ3.46097@sccrnsc01> Subject: Re: How does this look? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:17:29 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.252.148.188 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com X-Trace: newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net 1026667051 62.252.148.188 (Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:17:31 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:17:31 BST Organization: ntlworld News Service Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27095 Date: 2002-07-14T18:17:29+01:00 List-Id: "Caffeine Junky" wrote in message news:_DcY8.524447$cQ3.46097@sccrnsc01... > You know, I didnt have much trouble with other segments of Ada(so far), > but Storage Pools are really starting chaffe my ass. It seems like I > could re-declare the same variable a dozen times in each of a dozen > different packages of a program, and the compiler would still keep asking > me to re-declare it. S WAS ALREADY DECLARED! The only thing I can chalk > it up to is a bug in the compiler, either it's giving false errors or the > error message needs to be re-written to make sense. The problem isn't in the storage pools but in the declaration you have for Cell - try going back to it, maybe after some sleep ;-) The phrase ">>>Declaration Expected" isn't asking you to add yet another declaration, but rather that what you provided *isn't* a declaration. "S'Size" is a function call (although it might not look like it). See LRM Annex K. http://www.adaic.org/standards/95lrm/html/RM-K.html