From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f36545ebe2d5763
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Frank J. Lhota" <lhotaf@lexma.meitech.com>
Subject: Re: ObjectAda and Feb 29th
Date: 2000/02/29
Message-ID: <LgSu4.40$kE4.892@client>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 591353806
References: <368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Trace: client 951840939 38.163.203.81 (Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:15:39 EST)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:15:39 EST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-02-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Roger Barnett" <Roger@natron.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk...
>
> I've hit a problem with the special edition of the ObjectAda product
> from Aonix (version 7.1.105, running under Win 95) which I mention on
> the off chance it hasn't already been discussed here.

This is a known bug with ObjectAda. I believe Aonix offers a fix for version
7.1.2. See their web page for details.