From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f73d873d16dcda7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <jrcarter@acm.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Return statements and their scope - guideline
References: <eqvcsh$ql3$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
In-Reply-To: <eqvcsh$ql3$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <LYGAh.1196164$084.827457@attbi_s22>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s22 1171471275 12.201.97.213 (Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:41:15 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:41:15 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:41:15 GMT
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9324
Date: 2007-02-14T16:41:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> 
> I have found a coding guideline that allows return statements only in 
> the outermost scope in the subprogram - which is supposed to avoid 
> obscuring the control flow.
> 
> What is outermost scope in this context?
> 
> function F return Integer is
> begin
>   if Some_Condition then
>      return 0;   -- (1)
>   end if;
>   -- ...
>   declare
>     X : Integer;
>   begin
>     -- ...
>     return X;    -- (2)
>   end;
>   -- ...
>   return 7;      -- (3)
> end F;
> 
> Is (1) above in the outermost scope?

No. This is the rule in SPARK: You have to write

if Some_Condition then
    Result := 0;
else
    ...
    Result := ...;
end if;

return Result;

This makes the analysis easier. However, I've always felt

if Some_Condition then
    return 0;
end if;

is easier to read; if you're interested in the case where Some_Condition 
holds, then you don't have to read any further.

I wonder how such coding standards will deal with the extended return 
statement of Ada 0X.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"I blow my nose on you."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
03