From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38
X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!hw-filter.lga!fe07.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Alan Krueger <wgzkid502@sneakemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help
Subject: Re: ADA vs Java
References: <bllse.12013$q46.11010@newsfe1-win.ntli.net>
 <d8sokd$mka$1@news1brm.Central.Sun.COM> <uis0cdqez.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.18.11.20.22.386912@spacetime.de> <u8y17eoyb.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.18.21.43.42.515021@telus.net> <uoea2u9t1.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.19.22.22.32.110658@telus.net> <uhdfttuad.fsf@obry.net>
In-Reply-To: <uhdfttuad.fsf@obry.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <LOCte.4044$mD6.1586@fe07.lga>
X-Trace: 
 pikkdiabbdefphapblljodgkopkajcbpmbbpgkdhcmgcjmdicedhpifbkckifljmbhdfmiliiobjcjfbnjenafcdgmmbkiliocppmgobcekgmhkjajbekkalmbgnfoefegcmjhhibopfakdb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:13:15 MST
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:13:15 -0500
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11503 comp.lang.java.help:17787
Date: 2005-06-20T12:13:15-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> HansF <News.Hans@telus.net> writes:
>>But you do not answer the question, which is (rephrased): "Are you
>>implying that there are no bugs in any Ada compiler?".  
> 
> I did not answer this question because it is not a question, I mean you pretty
> well know the answer. All piece of software has bugs. But softwares built with
> Ada tends to have far less bugs per sloc than other languages.

You appear to be equating compiler bugs with quality of code implemented 
in the language.