From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d485db3760413be
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-18 02:50:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Compiler default initialization of array types
Date: 18 Oct 2002 04:50:30 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <LLvXOWdDrhx6@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <aombha$ong$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
 <uqtfi1i12aa730@corp.supernews.com> <wcc3cr4vcti.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1034934623 20261 192.135.80.34 (18 Oct 2002
 09:50:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29895
Date: 2002-10-18T04:50:30-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wcc3cr4vcti.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>, Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:

> I have written code where there were lots of giant arrays of pointers,
> inside a record with another component indicating how many are valid.
> Something like:
> 
>     type T is
>         record
>             Last: Natural := 0;
>             Pointers: Pointer_Array(1..Big_Number);
> 
> Typically, objects of type T would use just a few pointers -- like Last
> might be 3 or 4, but very unusual for it to be 1000 or 1_000_000.
> 
> It turned out that initializing all those unused pointers to null was a
> serious performance problem.  So I cheated: I declared the array as an
> array of integers (where the integer type was chosen to be the same size
> as a pointer), and used unchecked_conversion.

Efficiency will depend on the compiler and potentially the operating
system.  For package-level data on VMS, compilers that need a lot of
zeroed memory will typically emit linker instructions to "fake it"
with manipulation of the memory management system.

>        It would also help if the OP explained why default-init is
> undesirable.  Efficiency?  Interfacing to objects initialized in some
> other language, or by hardware?