From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, LOTS_OF_MONEY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-04 15:30:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail From: "AG" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1Zu77.187$EF5.315498@nnrp1.proxad.net> <9jp5eo$e2b$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <9jrdl3$mh2$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <%hb87.917$%w2.3730577@nnrp3.proxad.net> <9jrt62$38t$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B619A6D.5DD6E782@home.com> <3B6636BA.96FD8348@home.com> <9kb3ub$hdo$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <9kchn1$lng$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <9ke9pa$lks$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Subject: Re: Proving Correctness (was Java Portability) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:31:03 +1200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.55.179.16 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 996964203 210.55.179.16 (Sun, 05 Aug 2001 10:30:03 NZST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 10:30:03 NZST Organization: Xtra Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11297 Date: 2001-08-05T10:31:03+12:00 List-Id: "nicolas" wrote in message news:bmya7.18382$Iu6.4283510@nnrp1.proxad.net... > "Marin David Condic" a �crit dans > le message news: 9ke9pa$lks$1@nh.pace.co.uk... > > So, IMHO, Ada needs to be more "Customer Centered" and offer the users & > > potential users the kinds of things they are currently buying. Well, if you only offer what they are currently buying you aren't going to pull them away from what they are currently buying:) I thought the whole point was to offer something better. > > I agree. No product, how excellent it is, can afford to forget this > elementary rule If that was true we would still be using stone hammers to hunt wooly mammothes (or whatever the plural is for mammoth). After all - that was exactly what the customers were buying at the time.