From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-01 22:13:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 00:14:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 00:13:40 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ED6A852.75AC0133@adaworks.com> <3ED74ED3.4020505@noplace.com> <3ED7C8C5.3070902@cogeco.ca> <3ED826BB.9010509@noplace.com> <3ED92827.7050808@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: <3ED92827.7050808@noplace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.117 X-Trace: sv3-CFncsErZW5uufIn1dlD6VgE88WZFvgw17ZPTQgIcLhiEf30XHic+hQgQB613SOYrDrhNY0rIEAF1KKy!w2e+updX9cLyJPzKxaZ5VwZt7P/XtGtq2S1kZ5CcDjMVw+9cqETJPslu2UpOhC/EMFRBKJn61Rxp!ZAPscQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38302 Date: 2003-06-02T00:13:40-05:00 List-Id: > Nobody has the deep pockets to be able to say "Lets build one of > everything and let the market decide." Even if you did, it would only be > confusing for the end user and they'd retreat to what they know in order > to achieve freedom from choice. I learned a similar lesson from watching a relative "sell" real estate. She'd take the customer to a promising site, but then she'd overwhelm them with all the options. "You may need _____, which would imply a place with _____. But if you have ______, you'd of course want to minimize _____. (etc.) ...." When she got done with her college-level lecture on how to figure out what you need, they'd go buy from who _tells_ them, "This is what you need. Sign here."