From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,faac757f0214fa1d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-07 09:06:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: X11 binding with FSF version of gnat Date: 7 Feb 2003 11:06:13 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <060220032349197450%hopperj@macconnect.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1044637487 6251 192.135.80.34 (7 Feb 2003 17:04:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33883 Date: 2003-02-07T11:06:13-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Jean-Claude Mahieux" writes: > Why not use a full Ada implementation ? :) > We plan offering our XInAda Xlib under GPL, but need to allocate some time > to do it. My understanding is that Jim's purpose is to release the bindings with the GNAT compiler for OSX. That may be incompatible with your licensing model. > Top Graph'X Sales Manager