From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c3f76cf9b2829c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-31 13:30:23 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Duration vs. Ada.Real_Time References: <959u02$1o0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:30:18 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.20.190.201 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com 980976618 24.20.190.201 (Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:30:18 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:30:18 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4784 Date: 2001-01-31T21:30:18+00:00 List-Id: >I know our Ada vendor (GreenHills) chose to use microseconds as its >units for Ada.Real_Time.Time. ... >it has the unfortunate effect that any use of the high-res timer has to >be done via direct OS calls. Can you replace the body of Ada.Real_Time that they supply with one of your own?