From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!testfeeder.ecngs.de!81.171.118.64.MISMATCH!peer04.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!peer01.am1!peering.am1!npeersf04.am4!fx45.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Per Sandberg <per.s.sandberg@bahnhof.se>
Subject: Re: IoT / IIoT stuff
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <31402e8a-3d66-4b0b-b7ad-5bb34b17aa5e@googlegroups.com>
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.Usenet.SE
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <31402e8a-3d66-4b0b-b7ad-5bb34b17aa5e@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <KqYpy.274702$ey.247719@fx45.am4>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet.se
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:18:34 UTC
Organization: usenet.se
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:18:34 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3061419756
X-Received-Bytes: 2015
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29255
Date: 2016-01-27T06:18:34+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Well from my point of view the the important aspect is that we agree on 
a reasonable number of protocols on different levels in in the 
communication stacks and the protocols and standards (official or 
defecto) may be: IP, TCP, UDP, Spread, 0Mq, MQTT, AMQP,  Protobuff, 
Json, Corba, DDS,  or GumboJumbo.

I actually don't care which one and on what level we are talking , but I 
do care that the community agree on communication standards that are 
language neutral an includes the full semantics of the data flows from 
application down to the lowest level of transport.

The 0MQ bindings and the MQTT bindings was something I needed for some 
small projects (hobby and commercial).

You are quite right concerning DDS there is an Ada binding to the RTI 
implementation of DDS where I also was "involved".

I think that the next step would be to get a protobuffer implementation out.

/Persan

Den 2016-01-21 kl. 14:25, skrev slos:
> Some implementations may provide an Ada binding.
> I have found that most are open source and commercially supported.
>
> Do some of you have some thoughts and experiences to share on these subjects ?