From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ebbccbc114d641e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-24 06:31:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Genealogy Software Date: 24 Oct 2001 08:31:14 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3BD498DF.27E8B66C@otelco.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1003930276 11939 192.135.80.34 (24 Oct 2001 13:31:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15121 Date: 2001-10-24T08:31:14-05:00 List-Id: In article , ev_remove_this_ans@evans.pgh.pa.us (Arthur Evans Jr) writes: > There's an ISO standard for today as 2001.10.24 (or maybe 2001-10-24). > Dates stored like this go back further than any genealogist is likely > to need (well, unless you can trace back to Adam). Moreover, they > collate, in that an alphabetic comparison between two dates reveals > which is later. > > This solution of course does not address date ranges, or approximate > dates. Or issues regarding which calendar system was used to record that date. Today dates around the world are synchronized, but that was not so for a while after the pope ordered a change.