From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,affd14e05b8fb09a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-28 23:36:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn51feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s53.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Hierarchical States Machines
References: <cuCdnQ-6gqW-Eg3dRVn-tA@comcast.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <Kn1kc.12050$lz5.1211412@attbi_s53>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.132.82
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s53 1083220586 24.6.132.82 (Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:36:26 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:36:26 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:36:26 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7555
Date: 2004-04-29T06:36:26+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>and ran 40% slower. (Register pressure from those state variables push
  Do you mean the parser state transitions ran 40% slower, or the whole
compiler, including IO, lexer, symbol tables, code generation, etc
was slowed by 40%?