From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-17 14:58:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "AG" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305091549.48b9c5d9@posting.google.com> <7507f79d.0305121629.5b8b7369@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305130643.526f61c2@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305140436.534f7151@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305160440.7846d18c@posting.google.com> <3ec67910$1@nntp0.pdx.net> Subject: Re: Quality systems (Was: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died)) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:58:38 +1200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.88.60.104 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 1053208682 219.88.60.104 (Sun, 18 May 2003 09:58:02 NZST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:58:02 NZST Organization: Xtra Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37460 Date: 2003-05-18T09:58:38+12:00 List-Id: "WinGuru" wrote in message news:3ec67910$1@nntp0.pdx.net... It wasn't me you replied to but let me chip-in with an example: > In how much time under what conditions with what type or quality of hardware > and with what type of drivers? Have you made any particular analysis of why > there was the crash or did you just blame MS without any real clue as to > what went wrong? Seriously, do you have the post-mortem analysis? Are you > absolutely positive that you can ascribe the error to Windows and MS and not > some flaky hardware or device driver? I happen to run a multi-boot setup on a reasonably new, reasonably modern machine (all the latest patches and drivers installed). It has a regular plain-vanilla dial-up modem. Now, one of the systems installed (W98) has absolutely no trouble using it. Works fine. Another (W2K) has all sorts of problems even connecting. When it does, it connects at a lower speed and tends to drop the connection depending (apparently) on the current weather in Antarctica. Now - we have exactly the same hardware, exactly the same locality, phone line etc etc. One system works just fine, thank you. The other is a total flop handling a simple connection. Who would *you* blame?