From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60086334c984dfc2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 02:46:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The Ada Developers Cooperative License (was Re: RE:) Message-ID: References: <9j1v7e$8ik$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <5ee5b646.0107172350.1d6ef192@posting.google.com> Organization: LJK Software Date: 18 Jul 2001 05:46:52 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 995449617 216.44.122.34 (Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:46:57 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:46:57 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10139 Date: 2001-07-18T05:46:52-05:00 List-Id: In article <5ee5b646.0107172350.1d6ef192@posting.google.com>, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > A lot of nonsense has been written about the GPL recently, most > notably by a large company in Redmond. I suggest that anyone really > interested in understanding how this license works, and how it can > be used successfully in the context of our free enterprise system > should read the GPL FAQ now available at www.gnu.org. Whereas if I were looking for more discussion of this, I would look for a source less biased than either of the two cited above.