From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,915d37e7b8e0ec69
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny09.POSTED!0e8a908a!not-for-mail
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: and visual library once again
References: <dj8k0c$258u$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
   <dj90vj$lul$1@node3.news.atman.pl>   <4358067B.50208@obry.net>
   <dj91eo$m0l$1@node3.news.atman.pl>   <43580A43.4050507@obry.net>
   <1129861178.782874.87870@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <m2fyqububb.fsf@grendel.local>   <djbids$1o1e$1@node3.news.atman.pl>
   <1129927622.825849.56200@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1130045670.471015.25650@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1TF6f.1787$dW6.1751@trndny09>
 <1130053169.518277.86690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1130053169.518277.86690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <KLI6f.1793$dW6.124@trndny09>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:31:22 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.249.2.214
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trndny09 1130059882 71.249.2.214 (Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:31:22 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:31:22 EDT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5895
Date: 2005-10-23T09:31:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Steve Whalen wrote:
> But the change _does_ hurt the Ada language, which may not be dead,
 > but it sure isn't growing in popularity outside of the universe of
 > those who already know it's value.

Perhaps that's because most of the programmers who are using Ada use
it to create proprietary programs. That means that the users of those
programs don't know or care what in language they're written, because
they never see the sources. Now that programs compiled by GNAT GPL must
be licensed under the GPL if they're to be distributed, perhaps those
users will begin using Ada themselves once they see the beauty of the
Ada code which is being delivered to them.

Anyway, if someone feels really strongly about this, then he or she can
fork the GMGPL version. That happened with gcc and with X Window, so
there's no reason it can't happen here.