From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bc4be576204aa20
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "robin" <robin_v@bigpond.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <6ktjf.8048$ea6.3571@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <bhxjf.26172$q%.9983@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
 <9hhkf.10004$ea6.5952@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <3klkf.25509$dO2.19240@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>
 <wAqtf.147383$V7.109835@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <4626568.XPZCFmT196@linux1.krischik.com>
 <olZtf.165218$V7.83919@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <1136281961.9673.21.camel@sonnenregen>
 <utAxf.214697$V7.205239@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <12ces1lv5dvm6pifdapj11o1hrtlm6ec7q@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <KIWxf.215465$V7.157775@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.139.71.195
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1137194922 144.139.71.195 (Sat,
 14 Jan 2006 10:28:42 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:28:42 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2492
Date: 2006-01-13T23:28:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dennis Lee Bieber" <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:12ces1lv5dvm6pifdapj11o1hrtlm6ec7q@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:10:34 GMT, "robin" <robin_v@bigpond.com>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.ada:
>
> > No I'm not trying to do that.
> >     I'm saying that Ada code can be compiled by a PL/I
> > compiler, illustrating the versatility of the language.
> >     I'm not relying on any similarity of statements to achieve that.
> >
> Does that illustrate the versatility of PL/1 OR just the fact that
> the specific compiler incorporates multiple language parsers within it.

It illustrates the former.  The compiler does not have
an ADA language parser embedded in it.