From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-09 09:35:56 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-pas-nf2!newsfeed.earthlink.net!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
References: <1055173916.550383@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <KH2Fa.128274$M01.63696@sccrnsc02>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1055176554 12.234.13.56 (Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:35:54 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:35:54 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:35:54 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38863
Date: 2003-06-09T16:35:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> a runtime parse tree of the expression.
> ..., with the compiler doing massive inlining to achieve the efficiency
> of handwritten
  I'm confused.  You generate a parse tree at runtime, but the compiler
takes this runtime result and generates code?  Is this a two-pass process?