From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ad19,23963231b5359f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ad19,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23963231b5359f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,23963231b5359f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,23963231b5359f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-Thread: 107a89,23963231b5359f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid107a89,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-09 14:01:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: "AG" <ang@xtra.co.nz>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.awk,comp.lang.clarion,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.pl1
References: <3B0DBD4A.82943473@my-deja.net> <3B2056A5.86396F55@home.com>
 <GELwCw.K0r@approve.se> <gWlU6.444$jl3.78259@news.xtra.co.nz>
 <GEnxK3.3n8@approve.se>
Subject: Re: Long names are doom ?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <K8wU6.535$jl3.108463@news.xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 09:01:53 +1200
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.54.86.8
X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz
X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 992120490 210.54.86.8 (Sun,
 10 Jun 2001 09:01:30 NZST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 09:01:30 NZST
Organization: Xtra
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8497 comp.lang.awk:2954
 comp.lang.clarion:21553 comp.lang.java.programmer:75027 comp.lang.pl1:954
Date: 2001-06-10T09:01:53+12:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Goran Larsson" <hoh@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:GEnxK3.3n8@approve.se...

> Only two entities need to read that code:
>  * the author of this specific standard C library

Actually, the author doesn't really need to read it either - just type it in
;)

>  * the C compiler this standard C library is intended for

So, in other words it is a throw-away code? Written once and NEVER
under ANY circumstances to be revisited? Never needing ANY modifications and
totally free of any bugs present or introduced in the future by the changing
environment?