From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ded6ba3fc5b87b66 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: First time Ada has let me down Date: 2000/10/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 685751223 References: <8FD7DEBEEsynoptikdamudderfuck@news> <8t71vg$hsi$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 972495776 216.44.122.34 (Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:42:56 GMT) Organization: LJK Software NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:42:56 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-10-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8t71vg$hsi$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison writes: > In article , > Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote: >> Ted Dennison wrote: >> >> > Note to new posters: Always state up front that you are using Ada >> > 83. >> >> That seems a bit arbitrary, since he did state Ada 83 in the main >> question paragraph with which he ended the post. > > At least one poster already has missed that and posted an Ada95 answer. > :-( And I have seen posts where the version was indicated other than at the end and people still missed it. There is no magic answer for those who respond before reading, myself included.