From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx27.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is the best license to use for open source software? References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <397379a8-d894-46c9-b8a7-13c590af42ba@googlegroups.com> <616ae348-41f6-446f-9c4b-0da8e398e75b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:19:22 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:18:45 -0700 X-Received-Bytes: 2330 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1161006790 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:192056 Date: 2015-01-26T23:18:45-07:00 List-Id: On 26-Jan-15 15:46, Jedi Tek'Unum wrote: >>> If the Ada community is not interested in broadly attacking the problem >>> then nothing is going to change. >> > >> >Perhaps: >> > >> >1. Start a new thread with a specific issue you need help on >> >2. Start a new thread with one specific issue you want to know >> > how or if is being addressed by others >> >3. Start a new thread about what _you_ plan on contributing or >> > how you would like to contribute >> > >> >The Ada community doesn't need people to tell them what is wrong, they >> >need people to do something about it. >> > >> >When I rant it is part of a clear agenda of a strategic set of actual >> >actions, code, and deliverables, i.e. part of the solution. >> > >> >It seems that you have skills you can put to use for coding or helping to >> >build reusable non-license viral compiler packages, etc. Looking forward >> > to see your solutions. > > So the community here would rather shoot the messenger than accept the message? > Like I said, nothing changes. I don't think that's the point DBotton was making at all; merely that extending tangents off of tangents on a thread whose title has little to nothing to do with your topic *isn't* the way to get your concerns heard -- especially by those who *aren't* interested in licenses.