From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-16 09:15:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.flash.net!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Pat Rogers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3BC30674.BA88AAB6@brighton.ac.uk> <9pvv3t$ves$1@news.huji.ac.il> <3BC5D730.DA950CC7@boeing.com> <9q4pa7$1ad$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BC6ACC8.23EF21BC@free.fr> <3BC71F54.1FFE78FA@boeing.com> <1KGx7.26476$ev2.35117@www.newsranger.com> <3BC7AD82.2A0CCCD4@acm.org> <9qhiqr$af0$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Subject: Re: why not X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.176.121 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1003248874 ST000 208.191.176.121 (Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:14:34 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:14:34 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: Q[R_PJSCOXRQRILY@BJZ\_TDFRYB@GXLN@GZ_GYO^JWTEPIB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:14:34 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14706 Date: 2001-10-16T16:14:34+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" wrote in message news:9qhiqr$af0$1@nh.pace.co.uk... > I would again make the appeal that this would constitute "A Good Start" and > would satisfy a really large percentage of the practical usage. So long as > the requirements identify the plain vanilla case and that much is agreed on, > implemented and accepted as the de facto "standard" we could all all the > exceptional cases as it becomes apparent that they are needed/useful. > > Just so long as the structure of the component library lends itself to > adding the extensions, it would be fine to start with a smaller set just to > get it going. I would argue that the BC's are fine for all the above, they exist already, and they work. > BTW: Has anybody inquired with ACT, Aonix, RR, et alia, to determine if they > would have any interest in distributing a component library of any sort? I'm pursuing this, and wil post when I find something out. > Any vendors reading this who would care to comment? Team Ada may be the way to go. I'll post there next. -- --- Patrick Rogers Consulting and Training in: http://www.classwide.com Real-Time/OO Languages progers@classwide.com Hard Deadline Schedulability Analysis (281)648-3165 Software Fault Tolerance