From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a4656a5edc0dab4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s04.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C," Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <409F69CB.8020604@noplace.com> <40A218DD.9090903@noplace.com> <40A36368.7050104@noplace.com> <40A8AF7C.5000608@noplace.com> <40A9FBD4.40707@noplace.com> Subject: Re: Ada used in General Aviation (GA) applications? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s04 1085006569 24.147.74.171 (Wed, 19 May 2004 22:42:49 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:42:49 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:42:49 GMT Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:699 Date: 2004-05-19T22:42:49+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" wrote in message news:40A9FBD4.40707@noplace.com... > I don't know who ACT's customers are, but the last time I checked they > were not selling a compiler that is aimed at "embedded" systems. They > market a compiler that mostly wants to run on top of Unix and isn't > targeted to popular embedded processors. Perhaps it *can* be utilized in > some embedded/realtime applications, but I don't think they go out of > their way to try to make a kit to do so. (Perhaps they'd like to bid on > the next engine control I'll be working on?) So I'm guessing that there > must be *some* usage of Ada in areas that are not what most people would > call "embedded". > I dont disagree with your initial points (deleted) but the stuff above is not entirely correct. ACT certainly does "make a kit" to be used for embedded systems. They are the "preferred" vendor for vxWorks (Real-time embedded OS) they have or had a product for LynxOS (Real-time embdded though admittedly unix like OS) They will support (for a fee) proprietary kernels and no executive type installs. They target PowerPC which is a popular embedded computer...Perhaps not in your world... I have heard rumors of ARM support at various times (although again you are correct they dont market it for ARM) As for the "Perhaps they'd like to bid on the next engine control I'll be working on?" I would say...perhaps your right..