From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed16b323e88cf5a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-11 05:28:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: UniParser 0.1 released. Date: 11 Mar 2003 07:10:13 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1047388180 19611 192.135.80.34 (11 Mar 2003 13:09:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35194 Date: 2003-03-11T07:10:13-06:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> The point I raised was whether a prospective vendor is capable of dealing >> with an existing security policy. It was not an effort to redesign that >> policy. There may be other aspects of the policy of which you are not aware. > > But a disc will suffice? A disc (or tape) is a requirement. That does not mean it is the only requirement. Again, the purpose of my inquiry was with regard to an existing security policy, not to redesign that policy.