From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10461e,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10461e,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,7f8fc37d854731d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: Jan Steinman Subject: Re: Interesting but sensitive topic to discuss (HELP: - OOP and CASE tools) Date: 1996/11/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 194924862 references: <32813322.41C6@kyebek3.kjist.ac.kr> <55pqr5$136a@grimsel.zurich.ibm.com> organization: Bytesmiths, the Smalltalk tools team reply-to: Jan Steinman newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.ai Date: 1996-11-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <55pqr5$136a@grimsel.zurich.ibm.com>, Paul_Gover@uk.ibm.com wrote: > In <32813322.41C6@kyebek3.kjist.ac.kr>, Dong Oh Kim writes: > > ... > >Let me have your opinions about followings: > > > > 1. Is everything OK with existing oo development methods? > > If not, what are needed? and what stage should be enforced in the > > future,i.e,analysis or design,etc...? > > ... > > OK, here's my 2 cents: most OO development methods concentrate too much > on objects and too little on classes... Gee, in my 8 month experience with one well-known methodology, I felt just the opposite! It was impossible to model instance-specific behavior without pretending it was a class. Of course, we might just have been using it wrong... -- : To foil junk mailers, REPLY won't work. Please paste address in. : Jan Steinman : Bytesmiths : 2002 Parkside Court, West Linn, OR 97068 USA, +1 503 657 7703 : On the Internet since it was the DARPANET.