From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3f460aaba1863e2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:01:41 -0500 From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1120752411.808598.292980@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1121269243.013754.57720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1121883276.400592.326630@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <1122315253.757948.150350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <8_ydncLVTeRn5njfRVn-jA@megapath.net> <1122485760.918191.274380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1122545378.984920.272260@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1122998146.914353.174110@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1123093593.264508.256310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Private primitive operations available to entire package hierarchy. Can it be done? Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:04:45 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38 X-Trace: sv3-ktUqGfSr484KcWy8W00/plJqCN3kqMlPumwrnXcrrEfyaGH5Y408HsNEHnr6S8y9oAznffWQ8u4O/p1!NLaE27p4XFzxN5IWR9K2yDPjHC/jOqwgPRECNISSQlUffCj4MiajvRhj/Qbxvx673GTJKes1UFSx X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3942 Date: 2005-08-03T15:04:45-05:00 List-Id: "Lucretia" wrote in message news:1123093593.264508.256310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > As for the aliased problem I was having, I sorted that out as I was > creating access types inside my packages and using the *_Class type > which was "access all *_Type'Class" in the parameters instead of just > using ": in Some_Type'Class" DOH! Great. You usually can use type conversions to work around such mismatches (conversions on access types are usually allowed). Randy.