From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee6065fc75bfcb4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria.organon.com (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Overlaying of methods.
Date: 1997/10/07
Message-ID: <JSA.97Oct7152007@alexandria.organon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 278485515
Distribution: world
References: <34310F93.41C6@htl-bw.ch> <343131AC.6D6@bix.com>
 <34325DA2.41C6@htl-bw.ch> <EHDsGD.7ED@world.std.com>
 <343967BA.598C@htl-bw.ch>
Organization: PSINet
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <343967BA.598C@htl-bw.ch> Stefan M=?iso-8859-1?Q?=FChlebach <ia94mueh@htl-bw.ch>?= writes:

> But I'm still asking me why an explicit call 
> (Pack1.Pack2.Pack3.Init(...)) doesn't work.

For the exact same reason: there are two such Inits in Pack3, the
implicit inherited one and the explicitly declared one.

/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
STL, Belmont, MA 02178, 617.484.3383 
"Nightmares - Ha!  The way my life's been going lately,
 Who'd notice?"  -- Londo Mollari