From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2925b133078d1557 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Flexible Strings (was Equality operator...) Date: 1997/05/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 240082387 Distribution: world References: <9704301422.AA07755@most> <5kocg6$hln@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <53F35740C6EF076C.14BEEF8227919F71.39E2B6FED1F30314@library-proxy.airnews.net> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) writes: > I'm confused. Isn't that what storage pools are for in Ada 95? I can Yes. > create a pool so that new and Unchecked_Deallocation call routines I > define, on a type-by-type basis. What's the difference? The Ada route affords you rather more control over the implementation and use of the pool and the "access types" assigned to it. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com