From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a29f6c543c430f19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: GC - again, :-)
Date: 1997/05/03
Message-ID: <JSA.97May3190215@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 239231406
Distribution: world
References: <JSA.97Apr29155844@alexandria>
 <Pine.SGI.3.95.970430110433.18224A-100000@shellx.best.com>
 <01bc5742$bf3c7640$d5fd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <01bc5742$bf3c7640$d5fd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> writes:

> It seems to me that a representation clause would be the much the best way
> to specify what sort of storage reclamation strategy is applied to a
> storage pool. I would (quite strongly) suggest that full reclamation ought

I disagree.  I think the best way to approach this is via a subsystem
of generic packages which present a set of techniques and
implementation strategies.  Any storage pools used in the
implementation would not even be visible to clients.

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com