From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers
Date: 1997/05/27
Message-ID: <JSA.97May27162239@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 244315689
Distribution: world
References: <JSA.97May14201336@alexandria>
 <EACHUS.97May23174831@spectre.mitre.org> <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
 <5m859v$2qr@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net> <5mb3ra$1qj@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
 <dewar.864687070@merv>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.864687070@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> Kaz says
> 
> <<Digital logic still isn't technology>>
> 
> Since you are using the word technology in such a bizarre and unsual way,
> perhaps you could post your definition so we have some chance of understading
> what you are talking about.

I second this!  Kaz, just what in the world do you _mean_ by
"technology" anyway????


> P.S. Please do NOT expect other people to use the word in the same way, go
> to the dictionary to understand the way that everyone else uses the word!

Exactly...

/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com