From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/05/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 239041969 Distribution: world References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5k60au$gig@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5kb91p$1bc@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5kb91p$1bc@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku) writes: > Some aspects of CS have a scientific flavor; there is a fair degree > of empiricism. Whenever you prototype some software, or profile the > performance of a program, you are doing an experiment that is not > unlike a scientific experiment. You That's only a part of the story. In CS you are dealing with intentional artifacts and IMO that alone snuffs the "science" part. As I say, others will disagree... /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com