From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5997b4b7b514f689
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Reading a line of arbitrary length
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <JSA.97Mar5145035@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223341208
Distribution: world
References: <5ds40o$rpo@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1997Mar3.082830.1@eisner>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <1997Mar5.081213.1@eisner> kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes:

> In article <5fh5g0$80h@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>, ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig) writes:
> > In comp.lang.ada, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
> > 
> >>I strongly disagree that GC
> >>should not be simply transparent, and I do not like the idea of
> >>standardizing explicit programmer control, whatever that might be.
> > 
> > In a realtime application, I do not want to have time-critical parts
> > interrupted by GC.
> 
> That can be specified when instantiating the compiler purchase order.
> 
> Currently all known implementations support your goal!

Is there a version of AdaMagic without GC?  Seems unlikely.  Doesn't
seem to make any sense either.

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com