From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e70c13232dc4a26
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: logarithms on ada
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <JSA.97Mar5144425@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223349989
Distribution: world
References: <5fcqrs$ius@panther.Gsu.EDU>
 <01bc28ca$126a6a40$46fd1fcc@p5120.bda>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <01bc293c$68597140$d96f1fcc@p5120.bda> "Bob Klungle" <bklungle@ix.netcom.com> writes:

> implied). There is nothing on the surface or in any documentation that I
> can find that says or implies that ada.numerics.aux in an internal,
> non-standard package. I don't say it isn't, but nothing seems to say it is.
> Anyway, they both work.

It's not defined in the RM.  So, it is non-standard.

/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com