From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter
Date: 1997/03/28
Message-ID: <JSA.97Mar28134758@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 229066925
Distribution: world
References: <5hbrah$ctt$1@gail.ripco.com>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Date: 1997-03-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.859526751@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> Jennifer said
> 
> <,Because C is NOT an OO language, and C is only a subset of C++.
> We can not convert C++ code back to C.>>
> 
> Of course C++ can be translated to C, that's exactly what the original
> C++ processor does.

And, of course Ada can be translated (compiled) to C - isn't that what
the ICC compiler did/does?  It's not as if the original C++ "processor"
generated human readable C.

/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com