From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria.organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/06/30 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 253687962 Distribution: world References: <33B014E3.3343@no.such.com> <5oqp9s$7vj$1@news.nyu.edu> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-06-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: And then the really interesting bit: > as well as getting better debugging support in place using gdb (we > are very close to having gdb in Ada mode have 100% knowledge about > Ada data structures, including packed arrays, variant records, > variable length components depending on discriminants etc). This sounds great. One thing I've wondered about wrt gdb for Ada: is it reasonable to think that binaries of this could be placed out with those of GNAT? Or is this an unreasonable burden? /Jon -- Jon Anthony OMI, Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 "Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately, Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari