From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria.organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: ada and robots Date: 1997/06/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249400755 Distribution: world References: <97060510114032@psavax.pwfl.com> <339C1ECF.431B@mlb.cca.rockwell.com> <339E143A.349D@dynamite.com.au> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article gwinn@res.ray.com (Joe Gwinn) writes: > nonwitstanding. I have accumulated a list from the days of Ada83. Many > of these things are nominally fixed in Ada95, which is good, but maturity > takes time, even in compilers. A little skepticism can go a long way. True, skepticism is always a good thing - up to a point. But as long as we are talking personal "experience" here, in my experience, most C types are neo-ludites. /Jon -- Jon Anthony OMI, Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 "Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately, Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari