From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria.organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: ada and robots Date: 1997/06/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249398710 Distribution: world References: <97061611223212@psavax.pwfl.com> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article gwinn@res.ray.com (Joe Gwinn) writes: > "Sort of" is exactly right; neither correct nor consistent from compiler > to compiler. Some compilers also provided pragma volatile, but But this is all out of date. > We also had problems with different compilers handling generics > differently, especially with respect to the allowed nesting depth. Again - not relevant at this point. Actually it probably _is_ relevant only it now applies - IN SPADES - to C++ templates. > I believe these problems are fixed in the Ada95 standard, and should be > fixed in the Ada95 compilers. Correct. /Jon -- Jon Anthony OMI, Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 "Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately, Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari