From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2c55a8958380159
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria.organon.com (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Annex E - distributed systems - is it supported ?
Date: 1997/07/11
Message-ID: <JSA.97Jul11195530@alexandria.organon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 256284849
Distribution: world
References: <33C5EBE7.33D6@math.tau.ac.il>
Organization: PSINet
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <33C5EBE7.33D6@math.tau.ac.il> Yoav Tzruya <tzruya@math.tau.ac.il> writes:

> I'm interested in learning more about this annex and have some questions
> :
> 
> 1. does the gnat stub generator for this annex supports the dynamic
> binding - that is calls to remote subprograms identifed by accesses not
> known at compile time .
> 2. does tha gnat stub generator supports that use of RACW types
> completely (that is - remote access to class wide types).
> 
> I ask these questions cause as far as I could see it only generates
> stubs that are compatible with static remote calls.
> 
> (I ask these questions after reading the 'Design Document Implementation
> of Distributed Systems Annex of Ada9X in GNAT' by Kermarrec, Pautet and
> Schonberg )
> 
> can anyone help me out with this ?


Try looking at the latest descriptions of this (from a users point of
view) in GLADE.  See cs.nyu.ed pub/gnat/glade.

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
OMI, Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
"Nightmares - Ha!  The way my life's been going lately,
 Who'd notice?"  -- Londo Mollari