From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c434e6fc0d3ab95
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: What good is Ada ???
Date: 1997/01/07
Message-ID: <JSA.97Jan6204304@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 208180312
sender: news@organon.com (news)
references: <32cf95b5.9781483@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
organization: Organon Motives, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <32D067C8.3920@etsu-tn.edu> "Eric B. Lemings" <zebl1@etsu-tn.edu> writes:

> Ada is a more mature language; it has been standardized since 1983.

Well, actually, since 1995. ;-) Ada now means the language
standardized in ISO/IEC 8652:1995, whereas the 1983 standard should be
refered to by "Ada83" or some such.

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com