From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5997b4b7b514f689
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Reading a line of arbitrary length
Date: 1997/02/25
Message-ID: <JSA.97Feb24195840@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 221257320
Distribution: world
References: <5ds40o$rpo@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.856619522@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> and Robert will never forgive Tuck for refusing to fight for in out
> parameters for functions (but can't blame Bob, he agrees with me on
> that one).

Hold on - I thought that you no longer support this one (after seeing
some particularly bad examples of where some people wanted to use it)??!?

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com