From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/04/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 238158380 Distribution: world References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5j31lj$qnk@huron.eel.ufl.edu> <335F9D0E.41C67EA6@cacd.rockwell.com> <5jr4ak$dsm@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <336148DD.4BC0@mindspring.com> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <336148DD.4BC0@mindspring.com> Larry Wissig writes: > Definitely religious. Overloading functions of the same name with diff agreed. > Agreed Ada's rules are arcane. > > Point for C++. Huh? C++'s rules are at least as arcane here and rather less safe. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com