From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d51a4400ccde5d8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Ada/Java
Date: 1997/04/25
Message-ID: <JSA.97Apr24212322@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237258760
Distribution: world
References: <5j2r5d$s1p@lotho.delphi.com> <5jh808$g9n@news.ida.org>
 <335CDAF1.178A@bix.com> <JSA.97Apr22163404@alexandria> <335E30E2.1F9@bix.com>
Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



In article <335E30E2.1F9@bix.com> Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com> writes:

> > >   Must each record be a class?  Not all Ada records are tagged types.
> > 
> > Java does not support any other kind of first class object which has
> > structure.
>   So, at the Jave byte code level there is no structure larger than
> "words"?

You've lost me.  The basic point is that you want your Ada to fit in
as transparently as possible with any stuff generated from Java (the
language).

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com