From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d51a4400ccde5d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Ada/Java Date: 1997/04/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 237144854 Distribution: world References: <5j2r5d$s1p@lotho.delphi.com> <5jh808$g9n@news.ida.org> <335CDAF1.178A@bix.com> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article Samuel Tardieu writes: > >> Must each record be a class? Not all Ada records are tagged types. > > Jon> Java does not support any other kind of first class object which > Jon> has structure. So, yeah, this (currently) must be... > > Well, not exactly. You can always choose to group several Ada records > into one Java class if your goal is to minimize the number of class > files, and then use one part of the class or the other. You can even > use overlapping if you have fields of the same type in several > records. Could you say a bit more on how this would work? /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com